Texas X Riders

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6

Author Topic: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment  (Read 6031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

larry_357

  • Texas X Rider OverLord
  • ******
  • Posts: 2463
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2009, 12:17:56 PM »

 You know how it is Gumbo liberals have a one track mind and just keep drinking the kool aid
Logged
Alvin,Texas

WILD E

  • Old Timer
  • ****
  • Posts: 223
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2009, 12:47:39 PM »

Weather you own a firearm or not I don’t  think everyone is getting the big picture here ,
The government knows your 3 guns are not going to supply a drug cartel take over nor is a red neck with 5 or 10 various guns
That his granddad left him . Don’t you think that  a firearm  mfg.  or ammunition mfg. would know that someone buying 1200
Ar-15s or ordering 5000,000 rounds of ammo is  just a bit much for deer season or a collector who might want to do a little plinking .
Ship to : Bill Bob Muhammad  ,Mexico City  brbr 549  ????   
 They don’t need a door to door count  this is just the 1st step in gun control . Ok  Obama send out the list to every  foreign country in the world !!!  For What  ??  You like knock knock jokes ?   I also agree with the post stating that a convicted  felon should not be allowed to own a firearm ,  oh but may be allowed to run for President of the United States. Whereas acouring to his book was given a full pardon after the election.  ( ok still pissed  about that one )
Wake up America !!   :cuss:
E
Logged
03 1800 VTX RS BLACK
New Braunfels

MsVTX1300

  • Master Tejano Rider
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
  • Spring, TX
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2009, 01:09:15 PM »

 :popcorn:  I just love these debates!!  Go get'em, Gumbo!!  :stickpoke:   :popcorn:
Logged
[IMG]

Carol
2014 Victory Cross Country Tour
2006 VTX 1300 (The Lady)

ViciousNoob

  • Master Tejano Rider
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2009, 03:19:40 PM »


Actually, if you purchase a firearm from any "non-dealer", you do not have to do any paperwork at all.

If you buy from a dealer (gun store, pawn shop, ect.) you have to fill out a form 4473. All that the dealer does at that point is call into the ATF and make sure you do not have any felonies and is legal to own a gun. We write, if it has it, the serial number on the 4473 and store it in our files. If the ATF wants the 4473 on an individual, we must produce it. If they want the 4473 on a specific firearm, we must produce it. But when we call it in, they do not require us to give a make, model,. or serial number. All they say is "approved" or "not approved". I guess it is "technically" on file, but we have the ones we filled out in our files for audit purposes only.

So in essence, you really do not have to "register" a gun in the state of Texas right now at all..

THANKS for the info!  :thumbup:

Hmm, How long do you have to keep the 4473's on file? If you 'lose' a few, have a fire, etc,,, what happens then?
I think it will be just a matter of time before all that info is placed in a national registry, instead of held 'onsite',,, but I can see where that would be cost prohibitive.


Good questions. If we have a fire, we report to the ATF. I do not know what they will do, but we were instructed to call them within 24 hours and notify them.

And I agree that it is only a matter of time before they decide that they want to hold the 4473's...
Logged
If I wasn't n00b, I sure would want to be!!! ;-)

Gumbo

  • Board
  • Elvis
  • ******
  • Posts: 7980
  • 06 1800R
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2009, 09:04:23 PM »



"The proposed legislation would make the 'list' available to foreign countries,,, or am I reading this all wrong?"

And this is OK  ???

I'm perfectly fine with it!  I have 3 guns, you are more than welcome to tell anyone, anywhere that I have 3 guns. Don't care who ya tell. And your concern with this legislation is???? I really don't care if 'country X' knows how many guns I have. What may be beneficial to "country X" is to be aware of how many guns I 'turn', meaning, trade, sell, or exchange internationally  I believe this legislation will have a larger impact on gun dealers than it has than your average 'joe'. Even if 'joe' has a nice collection, (as my uncle has), I do not see this 'list' in the posession of a foreign country as any threat whatsoever, unless you are trading weapons out of country in an illegal manner. Providing you don't move guns out of the country, and you don't have enough weapons to wipe out an entire nation, I doubt that country X really gives a crap about you. 

"I don't believe EVERYONE has that right. Same as everyone does not have the RIGHT to drive. " :ohwow:

Are these general statements ???

Well, I can be more specific,,, I assume everyone here believes that not everyone has or should have the right to drive,,,,  OK, then Guns,,, Not everyone should have that right as well. I agree with the current gun laws regarding Felons, and would hope that all people convicted of 'agrievated' crimes, (crimes with a gun, etc)  would lose the privelage.


Lord love ya - I know the current administration does.
[/quote]

I see you are assuming everyone here believes that not everyone has or should have the right to drive ---- And this is specific, this is a far left assumption Specific would be blind or impaired vision -- Convicted of DWI repeatedly with no hope of rehabilitation ---  habitual speeder etc.
And your view on Guns, I could almost go with that, except the Felons and other criminals do not adhere to the current gun laws and could care less about privileges -- they will always have guns  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:
I'm thinking it has something to do with Katy drinking water, rumor is they were doing a little experimenting with fluorides and LSD 25, just prior to the election.  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:
Just a little friendly bantering  :couch: Please no more red letters, they freak me out  :t   
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 09:06:25 PM by Gumbo »
Logged
\"The moment you taste it, something wet and dark leaps on you and starts humping you like a swamp dog in heat, and the only way to get it off you is to eat it off, It\'s Gumbo!! If you don\'t eat it then the mystery beast will go right on humping you.

tom cat

  • Texas X Rider OverLord
  • ******
  • Posts: 1192
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #20 on: July 08, 2009, 01:15:42 AM »

I have a problem with my own government knowing about my guns, I sure don't want Osama knowing about them. I do not own a lot of guns, I'm your typical redneck, some guns have been in the family for generations. I don't like this one bit.   
Logged

hipshot

  • Texas X Rider OverLord
  • ******
  • Posts: 2795
  • New Caney, TX
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #21 on: July 08, 2009, 06:51:23 AM »

We can debate it all day. Ask this: What good would it do? Like gun control, it won't prevent crime. It's a huge waste of money to make a sniveling socialist look good to other countries. Nothing more.
Logged
02 1800C

Gumbo

  • Board
  • Elvis
  • ******
  • Posts: 7980
  • 06 1800R
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2009, 07:16:30 AM »

We can debate it all day. Ask this: What good would it do? Like gun control, it won't prevent crime. It's a huge waste of money to make a sniveling socialist look good to other countries. Nothing more.

Pertty much to the point and can't agree more.
I just enjoy  :pot: I have always studied reactions, you can tell a lot from how folks react.  ;)
Logged
\"The moment you taste it, something wet and dark leaps on you and starts humping you like a swamp dog in heat, and the only way to get it off you is to eat it off, It\'s Gumbo!! If you don\'t eat it then the mystery beast will go right on humping you.

Scotrod

  • Tejano
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #23 on: July 08, 2009, 07:16:52 AM »

I see you are assuming everyone here believes that not everyone has or should have the right to drive ---- And this is specific, this is a far left assumption

OK, so you believe everyone should have the right to drive? If so, please explain why, if not, please explain why you don't, and why my 'assumption' is incorrect, even if you feel the same way,,,

Specific would be blind or impaired vision -- Convicted of DWI repeatedly with no hope of rehabilitation ---  habitual speeder etc.

So, you DO believe every one does NOT have the right to drive,,,   ::)
For you far right winger's, I'll try to be more specific on the examples I use, and not assume that the 'far right' could ever be on the same page as the rest of America :stickpoke:   ;D

And your view on Guns, I could almost go with that, except the Felons and other criminals do not adhere to the current gun laws and could care less about privileges -- they will always have guns  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:

This is true, so your argument is that because felons and other criminals do not obey the laws, there should be no laws? If that's the case, lets decommission all the LEO's, as they are no longer needed. (No offense, hipshot)

 I'm thinking it has something to do with Katy drinking water, rumor is they were doing a little experimenting with fluorides and LSD 25, just prior to the election.  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:

Heh heh heh! My job requires that I spend 4-5 out of 7 days traveling the states,,, It must have been a nationwide experiment!!!! for


Just a little friendly bantering  :couch: Please no more red letters, they freak me out  :t 


The Red is now dead!  :) 
[/quote]
Logged

Scotrod

  • Tejano
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2009, 07:21:56 AM »

You know how it is Gumbo liberals have a one track mind and just keep drinking the kool aid

Still waiting for your answers to my questions,,,

I'm sure you have a well defined opinion that would back up your statement vs. 'durn Liberals!', so, go into detail!, let's hear it!  :)

The 'durn liberals / kool aid' "excuse" is getting pretty old,,, ::)'
Logged

Scotrod

  • Tejano
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #25 on: July 08, 2009, 07:24:19 AM »

I have a problem with my own government knowing about my guns, I sure don't want Osama knowing about them. I do not own a lot of guns, I'm your typical redneck, some guns have been in the family for generations. I don't like this one bit.   

What would happen if the government knew?

Just curious,,, you must have a reason that makes ya feel that way,,, so,,, what would happen if they knew?

Please explain,,,
Logged

Scotrod

  • Tejano
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #26 on: July 08, 2009, 07:27:53 AM »

:popcorn:  I just love these debates!!  Go get'em, Gumbo!!  :stickpoke:   :popcorn:

I LUV "em , too!   ;D

Bout time somethin come around to liven up this place a bit!!!  :stickpoke:

I play devils advocate at work all day long, for 'both' sides of the argument, what ever that argument may be!!! 

Got a building full of Engineer's, Draftsmen, Accountant's, Even some wandering Attorney's!!!

Debate is a GOOD thing!!!!!!!
Logged

Scotrod

  • Tejano
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #27 on: July 08, 2009, 07:37:57 AM »

We can debate it all day. Ask this: What good would it do? Like gun control, it won't prevent crime. It's a huge waste of money to make a sniveling socialist look good to other countries. Nothing more.

Well, I believe It's designed to help curb illegal international weapons trading, or at least that's what it's supposed to do,,,

I do not believe this legislation is intended to address anything at a local level.
 National / International level? well, that remains to be seen,,, The extradition clause looks appealing to me,,, So many 'slip through the cracks' due to 'non-extradition' clauses,,,

What would be your recommendation, Hipshot?
If we could implement some kind of 'something' that would help the LEO's where guns are involved, local, or international, what would you recommend?
Logged

CouldBFaster

  • Texas X Rider OverLord
  • ******
  • Posts: 1051
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #28 on: July 08, 2009, 08:49:50 AM »

W
I see you are assuming everyone here believes that not everyone has or should have the right to drive ---- And this is specific, this is a far left assumption

OK, so you believe everyone should have the right to drive? If so, please explain why, if not, please explain why you don't, and why my 'assumption' is incorrect, even if you feel the same way,,,

Specific would be blind or impaired vision -- Convicted of DWI repeatedly with no hope of rehabilitation ---  habitual speeder etc.

So, you DO believe every one does NOT have the right to drive,,,   ::)
For you far right winger's, I'll try to be more specific on the examples I use, and not assume that the 'far right' could ever be on the same page as the rest of America :stickpoke:   ;D

And your view on Guns, I could almost go with that, except the Felons and other criminals do not adhere to the current gun laws and could care less about privileges -- they will always have guns  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:

This is true, so your argument is that because felons and other criminals do not obey the laws, there should be no laws? If that's the case, lets decommission all the LEO's, as they are no longer needed. (No offense, hipshot)

 I'm thinking it has something to do with Katy drinking water, rumor is they were doing a little experimenting with fluorides and LSD 25, just prior to the election.  :stickpoke: :stickpoke: :pot:

Heh heh heh! My job requires that I spend 4-5 out of 7 days traveling the states,,, It must have been a nationwide experiment!!!! for


Just a little friendly bantering  :couch: Please no more red letters, they freak me out  :t 


The Red is now dead!  :) 
[/quote]
May I chime in here.
Not everyone should have the right to drive. Or bread in that case. If you can't feed them don't bread them! Now for the topic at hand here, gun control. If you can't see what's happening or just don't care. Stay the hell out of the way.

Now I have guns. If you want to know what guns I have good luck, coming in and checking them out.
What I have seen is that most people that want guns gone or under very strict control are the ones afraid to stand up for themselves or this country. :flag: :flag: :boxing:

We the people need to be able to stand up we equal power as the government in case our freedoms are in jeopardy. Not because they are going to be but to make sure that they are not ever going to be.
If you Dem wit democrats can't understand that my god help you if something happens, because I won’t nor will the rest of us "Right Wingers"

Now this is what I think. You are welcome to you thoughts no matter how wrong they are. God Bless America! :flag:
 :boxing:
Logged
Catching a yellow-jacket in your shirt at seventy miles per hour can double your vocabulary.

Honest officer .... I aint driving fast ..... just flying low ....


"I'll keep my money, my freedom and my guns, You can keep the "change"."

┌П┐ (•_•)┌П┐

larry_357

  • Texas X Rider OverLord
  • ******
  • Posts: 2463
Re: Using forein treaty to eliminate the 2nd Amendment
« Reply #29 on: July 08, 2009, 08:52:08 AM »

 :agree:
Logged
Alvin,Texas
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal